Data security incident trends

• 11 September 2024 - Data updated to Q2 2024
• 11 June 2024 - Data updated to Q1 2024
• 15 April 2024 - Data updated to Q4 2023
• 24 January 2024 - Data updated up to Q3 2023.
• 1 November 2023 - Data updated up to Q2 2023.

There are some limitations to the data contained in this release. Notably:

• The data starts at Q2 2019 as incidents were recorded differently prior to this period.
• Categories and incident types are allocated by the ICO and are assigned as a best fit. In some cases multiple factors will have contributed to an incident but in those cases the most significant incident type or category is assigned.
• As with categories and incident types, the sector is allocated by the ICO and is assigned as a best fit.
• The way the ICO inputs data changes over time. This results in some discrepancies, so caution should be taken when drawing conclusions on changes in specific sectors, incident types or outcomes.
• The way we categorise incidents as cyber or non-cyber within the dashboard is currently under review. As noted above, caution should be taken when drawing conclusions from the split of incident category.
• Although the data can provide insights on the general trends of data security incidents, it should not be seen as a definitive source as it contains only the data security incidents that were discovered and then reported to the ICO.
• There may be some instances of inaccurate data, such as dates or number of data subjects affected. This could be due to human error or this data not being accurately reported by the organisation reporting the breach. Although we have tried to identify and correct historic errors, there may be some that have not been corrected. We are looking at ways to improve data quality moving forward.
• There are some occasions where the data recorded for a particular breach is incomplete. In these cases, the missing details are not included in the dashboard. Therefore, some sections of the dashboard may have less datapoints than others.
• Under specific circumstances some cases are transferred to a separate system for review. As a result, these cases, which may include some of the larger and more serious breaches, are not included within this data.
• The case management system needs both a date and time for when a breach was discovered. Where only a date and not time is provided by an organisation, the case handler will input midnight as the time a breach was discovered. This may mean that some breaches are labelled as being submitted outside the 72 hour window required even when they were reported on time.
• Data presented is generally based on the information provided when an organisation initially reports a breach. Any additional information provided as the case progresses is used to reach an outcome, but this is not added to this system. As such the information provided here should be viewed as a point in time reflection of the incident report.
• Some categories of data are presented as ranges. This is to guard against conclusions being drawn with spurious accuracy and to ensure we are only providing the information that is required for analysis to limit the instances where specific incidents can be identified.
• We changed our definitions of ‘informal action taken’ and ‘no further action’ in April 2021. This means there are far more cases recorded as ‘informal action taken’ since that date than before it, compared with ‘no further action cases’.
• In late 2019 we moved away from recording cases as ‘general business’, and tried to be more specific. This means it will look as though we received fewer of those cases from that sector, when instead we’ve just categorised the cases differently.
• There was a substantial drop in reporting in Q2 2020 which is likely a result of the first national UK coronavirus lockdown in 2020 (March 2020 to Jun 2020).